首页> 外文OA文献 >Assemblage, size and abundance bias in a novel sandy shore macro-infaunal sampling technique
【2h】

Assemblage, size and abundance bias in a novel sandy shore macro-infaunal sampling technique

机译:一种新颖的沙质海岸宏观污染取样技术的组合,大小和丰度偏差

摘要

Sampling sandy shore macro-invertebrate fauna is critical in enhancing our understanding of beach ecology and conservation, and is a common monitoring approach. The traditional, and almost universal, method of sampling involves sieving sand to locate infauna, but here we describe a novel Hydraulic Sampling Device (HSD), a candidate method for future macro-invertebrate sampling, which has the potential to be faster and more effective at sampling invertebrates. We compared the results obtained by these two methods. Macro-invertebrate fauna of six beaches on Phillip Island, southern Victoria, Australia were sampled in the upper and lower beach. On average, the HSD sampled a smaller size range of fauna than the sieving method, perhaps because of longer handling times and escape of larger individuals. The sieving method found more individuals and a higher species richness. The methods we describe do not produce directly comparable results. On balance, the sieving method is simpler, apparently not as prone to ‘escape bias’, and reports higher abundances and richness of beach infauna.
机译:对沙质海岸无脊椎动物区系进行采样对增进我们对海滩生态和保护的理解至关重要,也是一种常见的监测方法。传统的,几乎是通用的采样方法涉及将沙子过筛以定位动物,但是在这里,我们描述了一种新颖的液压采样设备(HSD),这是未来的大型无脊椎动物采样的候选方法,它有可能变得更快,更有效。在无脊椎动物采样时。我们比较了通过这两种方法获得的结果。在澳大利亚上维多利亚海滩和下海滩,对澳大利亚南部维多利亚菲利普岛的六个海滩的大型无脊椎动物区系进行了采样。平均而言,HSD采样的动物群范围要比筛分法小,这可能是因为处理时间更长且个体较大。筛分法发现更多的个体和更高的物种丰富度。我们描述的方法不会产生直接可比的结果。总的来说,筛分方法更简单,显然不像“逃避偏差”那么容易,并且据报道海滩丰饶度更高,丰度更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号